kill a bad deal
  • Retips1_728x90
  • land investing action plan banner 728x90
  • Stride_728x90
  • TLP Graphic 728 x 90
  • 10X Your Income 728x90
  • Fund & Grow 728x90

Most bad land deals don't look bad at a surface-level examination.

They usually look cheap, flexible, and full of potential. You start thinking about all the different things you could do with it. Build, subdivide, lease it, hold it long term.

That's what pulls people in.

But none of that matters if there isn't a clear, realistic way to make the land useful or profitable.

If you can't answer that quickly, it's not a deal. It's just land you're hoping figures itself out later.

Step 1: Define what the land is actually good for

Before you look at anything else, you need to answer one thing:

What is this land actually good for?

Not theoretically. Not “maybe someday.”

What can it realistically be used for today or in the near future?

That could be:

  • Development
  • Resale to a specific type of buyer
  • Some form of income (agriculture, leasing, etc.)

If you can't clearly define that, everything else is guesswork.

You'll sometimes hear people justify a deal with secondary uses like grazing leases, hay production, or small-scale agricultural income.

Those can help offset holding costs, but they rarely make a deal work on their own. If the primary use case doesn't make sense, small income streams usually aren't enough to sustain it over the long term.

A lot of land gets sold based on possibilities, but possibilities don't pay you. Execution does.

Step 2: Don't let a low price fool you

One of the easiest traps is assuming a deal works because the price is low.

It doesn't.

Land can be “cheap” for a reason:

  • Limited access
  • Zoning restrictions
  • No utilities
  • Physical constraints
  • No real demand for the end use

If the land can't support a clear use case, the price doesn't matter. You're just tying up capital in something that's hard to exit.

Step 3: Pressure test how hard it is to actually execute

Development looks easy, right?

In reality, it rarely is.

Permits, utilities, access, timelines: all of it adds friction. And that friction usually shows up as time or money.

A lot of people also focus on what the deal looks like after everything is built. They run the numbers based on finished value and potential income, and maybe even factor in lease-up time.

best land uses

What gets missed is everything that happens before that.

Construction takes time. Projects get delayed. Costs move. And during that entire period, the property isn't generating anything, but you're still carrying it.

Unless you've structured things very carefully, you're covering interest, holding costs, and unexpected expenses out of pocket while you wait.

That's where a lot of deals start to fail.

Step 4: Look for the problems you won't see at first glance

The biggest issues are usually the ones that aren't obvious.

I sold a 3-acre lot in Big Sky, Montana, with an absolutely stunning view, but it had multiple natural springs running through it. That severely limited where anything could actually be built and would likely require helical pilings.

In Wyoming (and other states), you'll run into bentonite clay in some areas, which can make land difficult or expensive to build on. In some cases, it's not very usable for agriculture either.

I also know someone who bought around 280 acres that looked incredible. The problem was that it didn't have water rights and wasn't irrigated. They built a house on it, but beyond that, the land is extremely limited in what it can actually be used for.

We looked at another piece of land for a development in Wyoming that checked every box at first. Great location, incredible views.

But the utilities weren't close. To actually build on it, we would have had to run utilities more than 500 feet from the nearest connection point. That alone would have cost somewhere in the $120K–$150K range.

utility line extension

At that point, it wasn't a deal anymore.

These aren't rare situations. They come up all the time.

And they don't show up unless you dig into the details.

How to actually check these things

You don't need to go deep on every property, but there are a few quick ways to catch most of these issues early:

  • Water rights: Check state water databases or ask the listing agent directly. In many areas, no water rights means limited use beyond basic residential.
  • Soil conditions (like bentonite clay): Look at county soil maps or talk to local builders and excavators. They'll know quickly if it's a problem area.
  • Geotechnical issues (when things aren't clear): If there are signs of unstable soil, drainage issues, or anything unusual, a geotechnical report can confirm what you're actually dealing with. It's not something you need on every property, but on higher-dollar or questionable sites, it can save you from a much bigger problem later.
  • Utilities: Call the utility providers and ask how far the nearest connection is and what the typical cost per foot is to extend service. You can get a rough estimate quickly.
  • Zoning and use restrictions: Check county zoning maps and confirm what's actually allowed, not what someone assumes is allowed.

None of this takes long, but it can save you from spending time on a deal that was never going to work.

Step 5: Be realistic about time and exit

Land deals almost always take longer than expected.

Even if the plan is solid, things rarely move on your timeline.

Holding costs, taxes, and opportunity costs all add up while you're waiting for things to move forward.

If your deal only works on a tight timeline, it's probably thinner than it looks.

You also need to be clear on who the buyer is on the other side.

Many purchases don't turn out well for the buyer because there's no clear exit. It's just “someone will want this eventually.”

That's not a strategy.

A quick way to filter deals

You don't need a complicated model to filter out most bad land deals.

land buying criteria

You just need to be honest about a few things:

  • Is there a clear, realistic use for the land?
  • Does that use actually make sense financially?
  • Are there any physical or legal constraints that limit the use?
  • How long will it realistically take to execute?

If you can't answer those confidently, it's probably not worth spending more time on. Most bad deals don't need deeper analysis; they just need a more honest first pass.

The bottom line

Most land deals don't fail because they're complicated.

They fail because the fundamentals weren't clear from the start.

The deals that actually work are the ones that still make sense when things go a little sideways. Because at some point, they will.

If you focus on what the land can actually support and ignore the “what if” scenarios, you'll quickly eliminate most bad deals.

And the ones that are left are the ones worth paying attention to.

Alex WrightAlex Wright is a real estate investor and former Realtor based in Wyoming. He’s the founder of DealForge, a platform that helps investors analyze real estate and small-business acquisitions using real-world assumptions and scenarios.

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

REtipster Club

Discover the REtipster Club

Learn what successful investors aren’t telling you.
Become a member, achieve financial freedom and
make your dream a reality!

Join the Club!
Scroll Up

Welcome to REtipster.com

We noticed you are using an Ad Blocker


We get it, too much advertising can be annoying.

Our few advertisers help us continue bringing lots of great content to you for FREE.

Please add REtipster.com to your Ad Blocker white list, to receive full access to website functionality.

Thank you for supporting. We promise you will find ample value from our website. 

Loading